i think you all should know this: Mind Control With Satellites

In an excerpt from an article entitled “Pentagon Research to Beam “Voices” Into Your Head by Sharon Weinberger, Washington Post, January 15, 2007. Ms. Weinberger writes:

These weapons are also called “psychotropic weapons” (psychological electronic) another common term for mind control technology.

In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented technology using microwave to send words into someone’s head. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request field for this article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding the patent. Records that state that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientist were able to transmit phrases, into the heads of human subjects, although marginally intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear - the research laboratory citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials.

The official U.S. Air Force position is that there are no non thermal effects of microwaves. Yet Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA’s Langley Research Center, tagged microwave attacks against the human brain as part of future warfare in a 2001 presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association about “Future Strategic Issues.”

Meanwhile, the military’s use of weapons that employ electromagnetic radiation to create pain is well-known. As are some of the limitations of such weapons. In 2001, the Pentagon declassified elements of this research: The Active Denial System, a weapon that uses electromagnetic radiation to heat skin and create an intense burning sensation.

So, yes, there is technology designed to bear painful invisible rays at humans, but the weapons seems to fall far short of what could account for what many Targeted Individual’s symptoms. While its exact range is classified, Doug Beason, an expert in directed energy weapons, puts it at about 700 meters, and the beam cannot penetrate a number of materials such as aluminum. Considering the size of the full-scale weapon, which resembles a satellite dish, and its operational limitations, the ability of the government or anyone else to shower beams at hundreds of people - on city streets, into their homes and while they travel in cars and planes is beyond improbable.

Perhaps one of the most heinous uses of the technology is to arouse or sexually stimulate a target. Those that are manning the technology, pervertly, ruthlessly, seem to take great joy and pleasure with targeting both men and women in this manner, although specifically women who are 70% of those currently being targeted. They then are not above manipulating the appearance of a chance meeting, giving a false name, and trying to materialized their sexual fantasies. This writer is a witness to this unethical behavior and the acts of these predators, who are so immoral, that they think nothing of using their trusted positions to prey on others for their personal sexual gratification. This, if for any other reason, literally screams for the imperative need for monitoring of those entrusted with the technology to insure that it is used ethically, morally and not as a tool to abuse others or take advantage of the unsuspecting.

Is this what was in mind when the technology was entrusted to them? I must believe that it was entrusted to them to be used professionally and ethically. However, the technology in the hands of those lacking integrity, self control, and decency, consistently has proven to be a source for these people to practice criminal behavior in the name of the law. Not everyone is going to be happy about being targeted in such an animal way. After they realize that you are not playing along, and will bravely expose their sexually deviant behavior, my experience has shown that they then resort, as cowards, and bullies, to death threats, thus fearing the public knowing about their disgraceful behavior? The nature of the technology allows this due to its covert, secret nature, inside a person's home and out. Below is a website that shows that testing for these now advanced technology begin as far back as the 1930's.

NOTE: The subliminal technology, again, in my opinion is the most heinous, abusive, and unethical technology of all. In the hands of self serving law enforcement, who are egotistically, results orientated no matter what, right or wrong, or after investing time and energy into a situation that is fruitless, it can and is used to manipulate psychologically their desired result while sleeping. This is immoral at the highest level. Also, personal, unprofessional mentalities are prevalant and if they do not like you or perceive you as a challenge to them, they will, maliciously use the technology to literally mind rape a person by repetitive suggestions then sit waiting to trigger what ever suggestions they are planting. The technology currently is all over the place, used also by civilians, and now being used in the same way that people have sought help in such area as to quit smoking, etc.. This technology in the hands of unscrupulous law enforcement, or anyone, is nothing short of criminal. The hope is in the knowledge of its existence, use and capabilities which allows the conscious mind to recognize and adjusts. Knowledge is the key.

Conclusion

The combined use of these technologies enables remote torture and interrogation. (Memories are triggered by neurophone questioning and the brain wave analysers deliver the answers). Any nebulous arguments about US national security and the need for classified research on human subjects speak for themselves. (The writer has a copy of a White House internal memo, signed by Bill Clinton on these matters).

Remember that in the past CIA mind control experiments have involved LSD as well as electro-shock treatment.

The MK Ultra (Mind Control) program itself is infamous as are the instances where implants have been detected by X-Ray etc. Also there are those experimented on under the the cover of 'Alien visits'. Today, Neurophone and mind reading technologies are at the forefront of similar programs. In many ways these new technologies are an even more sinister means of conducting illegal human experiments.

Colonel John Alexander, advising head of NATO'S non-lethal weapon initiative, is the main proponent of these technologies. He favours all manner of devices which can, from a distance, induce illnesses, read minds and covertly harass innocent targets. If he could he would implant a microchip in each newborn child and initiate a mind control programme designed to brainwash the entire planet or at least those not fully in tune with their New World Order. Even to entertain such a thought is criminally insane yet he has said such things in public. In fact Scientific American magazine and the major Scandinavian newspaper, Helsingen Sanomat, have suggested all people will be implanted with a DNA microchip in the future. E.g Prince William has already been implanted (for "location" purposes?) while some U.S Military/Agency personnel, including NASA astronauts, have been implanted so as to study their thoughts/emotions etc. Think of the possibilities for robotics and cloning in the future.

Remember, these technologies (developed for times of war / terrorism) are (post cold war) being used today on lobbyists, intellectual dissenters and peaceful activists; to discredit and silence them. (So much for democracy.) Notably different methods are often used on different victims within a certain area (city) so as to avoid providing a pattern for investigators to observe. This also provides a cross section of political targets for their experimental programs.

It is also noteworthy that some of the victims are ex-agency / military personnel who have rebelled or tried to blow the whistle on corrupt practices within these organisations. Some of these report that not only have the thoughts and emotions of millions of targets been catalogued by military/intelligence agencies but all such agencies have political/mafia/media links due to both infiltration and association. Many of the actual monitors/harassers are also recruited from the worst possible sources.

These people also report that experiments in controlling voters by these remote methods were tried in

Haiti

, Bosnia etc AND that in 1994, the U.S D.O.D proposed using such technology on all individuals opposing their views(and competitors etc). The DIA would know.

N.B. These technologies are invariably used in conjuction with satellite (audio / visual) surveillance; creating the effect of an electronic POW concentration camp. Mental rape is only one of the many crimes committed in this mobile environment. E.g scientists, writers, political/military leaders etc can have their intellectual property stolen at the source. Without doubt the computers store and analyse the intelligence gathered by surveillance/harassment technologies. Their vast memories allow detailed studies of how the human mind works so as to learn how to influence and/or control people. Duplicating these processes for robotics and other artificial intelligence purposes is another sinister goal.

The US and other world governments are guilty of fostering gross human rights abuses by using these methods. Their covert operators can now do their worst without fear of detection. The cost is justified by the control gained and the experimental results achieved. Of course, (as with the space program and military expenditures in general) the funds used could be better spent solving real problems like hunger, disease, poverty and crime.

Recommendations

	Agencies such as the CIA, ASIS and ASIO should be accountable to appropriately selected committees etc.
	Military units, like Australia's DSD and the U.S. DIA, should not have the right to access satellite (or other) technologies to spy on or harass law-abiding citizens; especially in their own country. Equally they should not assist foreign governments with 'Big Brother' systems like Echelon, except where assisting with law enforcement activities (which they do not).
	Federal Police should be able to access oscillating scanners and EEG machines like SQUID (Superconductor Quantum Interface Detector) through the defence department or appropriate facilities. These can detect the relevant frequencies and this provides proof.
	There needs to be a United Nations Satellite Committee to oversee developments in satellite technology from a humanitarian perspective.
	UN weapons inspectors should include non-lethal weapons and satellite weaponry on their checklists.
	The International Criminal Court should deny veto rights to the US government. The threat of class actions against US government departments may then lead to the end of these atrocities.

On a positive note...

(i) Pres. Clinton has issued a memo promising greater protection for human subjects of classified research. (The memos very existence is an admission of guilt).

(ii) Sen. John Glenn introduced a bill (22/1/97) called The Human Research Subject Protection Act. (And he'd know how necessary that is).

(iii) The European Parliament recently passed resolutions calling for a world convention to ban all weapons used for human experimentation/manipulation. (see Resolution on the environment security and foreign policy A4 - 0005/99, Jan 28th, 1999.EP1159). The European Parliament also called for a convention introducing a global ban on any weaponry enabling manipulation of human beings. The International Committee of the Red Cross also expressed its concerns in July '94.

(iv) UNIDIR (The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research) has issued a media guide to disarmament esp. re weapons of mass destruction. Non-lethal weapons are listed and the list includes mind control weapons. Resolutions, treaties, international conventions/laws must quickly be introduced to bridge the gap between rapidly advancing (and usually 'classified') technologies and inadequate laws. UN weapons inspectors should then seek access to government (et al) facilities (worldwide - including the U.S.) to eradicate these evil weapons.

(V.) ON 28TH DECEMBER 2003 THE MICHIGAN GOVERNOR SIGNED PUBLIC ACTS 256 AND 257 (EFFECTIVE 1/1/04). THESE OUTLAW THE USE OF ANY EM WEAPON ON ANYONE. PENALTY - 15 YEARS-LIFE.

However these are only promises recognising the problem. None have yet bore fruit. The use of most "non-lethal" weapons contravenes the spirit of all privacy laws and criminal codes as well as every relevant code and convention in play internationally; including The Declaration of Human Rights. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Geneva Convention and The Nuremberg Code. The perpetrators are guilty of crimes against humanity. Those supporting them are engaging in class warfare of the worst kind.