Unethical
Health Experiments Done in U.S.
- Posted by Yara Tercero-Parker
- February 28,
2011
[Courier-Journal]-U.S. government doctors once thought it was
acceptable to experiment on disabled people and prison inmates, including
giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut ,
squirting a pandemic flu virus up the noses of prisoners in Maryland
and injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital.
Much of this occurred 40 to 80 years ago, but
it is the backdrop for this week’s meeting in Washington of a presidential bioethics
commission. It was triggered by the government’s apology last fall for federal
doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years
ago.
An Associated Press review of medical journal
reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies. Some
searched for lifesaving treatments; others hurt people but provided no useful
results.
They will be compared to the well-known Tuskegee syphilis study in which U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who had syphilis but didn’t give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available.
They will be compared to the well-known Tuskegee syphilis study in which U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who had syphilis but didn’t give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available.
Attitudes about medical research were
different when the studies were done. Infectious diseases killed more people,
and doctors worked urgently to invent and test cures. Many researchers felt it
was OK to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society —
prisoners, mental patients, poor blacks.
“There was definitely a sense — that we
don’t have today — that sacrifice for the nation was important,†said Laura
Stark, a Wesleyan
University assistant
professor of science in society who is writing a book about past federal
medical experiments.
No comments:
Post a Comment